Assessing Speech Intelligibility and Severity

Assessing Speech Intelligibility and Severity

Assessing Speech Intelligibility and Severity What are some standard procedures? Are measures of intelligibility and severity the same? Although judgements about intelligibility and severity may be correlated, they represent two

different indices about an individuals speech For example, a child may have a severe resonance disorder, but his/ her speech is still intelligible Intelligibility Scales

Typically a panel of 2-5 listeners (expert ~ novice; familiar ~ unfamiliar) rate a taped (audio or video) segment of childs speech Rank intelligibility of childs speech compared to age peers Scales typically use 3-point or 5point judgment scales (See Bleile) scores are averaged to derive a composite intelligibility rating score Intelligibility Scales

Kent, Miolo, & Bloedel (1994) compared 19 intelligibility measures according to 5 categories that differed with regard to the emphasis of the analysis (phonetic ~ phonemic; word level ~ conversation) Intelligibility Scales Listed 8 factors that influence clinical evaluation of intelligibility:

loss of phonological contrasts loss of contrasts in specific environments extent of homonymy amt of difference between target~realization frequency of occurrence in English

consistency familiarity of listener with speaker context in which communication occurs Intelligibility Weston & Shriberg (1992) concluded that articulation variables alone cannot account for all the breakdowns that result in communication other general contextual and linguistic variables are related to

speech intelligibility Severity Similar to intelligibility rating scales, a panel of familiar or unfamiliar listeners judge a segment of a childs recorded (audio or video-taped) speech (single word or connected speech) Severity

Perceptual scales (see Bleile) or quantitative measures 4 Point Clinical Judgement Scale of Severity No disorder-Mild-Moderate-Severe average score of 3.5 often required to provide clinical services Severity Quantitative Measures PCC (and 8 variations)

Hodsons PDS Edwards PDI Comparison of PCC and PDS Severity Ratings PCC PDS Mild >90% Mild

1-19 pts Mild-Mod 65-85% Moderate 20-39 Mod-Sev 50-65% Severe

40-59 Severe <50% Profound 60+ Shriberg, Austin, Lewis, McSweeny, & Wilson (1997) 9 speech metrics

PCC (based on conv speech) PCC-A (common clinical distortions scored correct) PCC-R ([un]common distortion scored correct) ACI (differentially weighs distortion ~ sub/omis) PCI (percentage of sounds mastered-early talkers) PVC (similar to PCC, but for vowels/diphthongs) PVC-R (similar to PCC-R, but for vowels/diphthongs) PPC (percentage to consonants/vowels correct) PPC-R (scores distortions correct) Which metric is most appropriate? Depends on specific needs of the assessment Interest limited to consonants

PCC, PCC-A, PCC-R, ACI Young/severely delayed children PCI Interest in vowels/diphthongs PVC, PVC-R Interest in articulation competence on all speech sounds PPC, PPC-R Rafaat, Rvachew, & Russell (1995)

Purpose of study was to determine the percentage of agreement between SLPs in rating PI severity Adequate reliability for older children (4;6+), but unreliable for children under 3;6 Unable to reliably distinguish TD from mild delay Why were SLPs less reliable on severity

ratings of younger children? What factors account for differences in reliability ratings?

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Label Confusion - MN PIE

    Label Confusion - MN PIE

    Recent Progress on Labeling . The Label Review Manual has been revised and updated. ... For the Sevin label again, it notes waterproof and if you want to know the ones from the chart, the chart letter. No too bad....
  • 9 MIKE MAZZALONGO Wisdom Proverbs Ecc. 7:1-29 Contrasting

    9 MIKE MAZZALONGO Wisdom Proverbs Ecc. 7:1-29 Contrasting

    Ecclesiastes 7:1-15. 7 Comparative. 1 Contrastive. 1 Completive . Devices} Wisdom Proverbs. The value of a good name. A good name is better thana good ointment, - Ecc. 7:1a. Wisdom Proverbs. Death is better than birth.
  • Developing Medical Education Fellows Within Wessex

    Developing Medical Education Fellows Within Wessex

    This resource is aimed at anyone who wants to expand their horizons in Medical Education. As trainees with a passion for education and training, we know how difficult and daunting it can be to start building up experience in this...
  • Dancing in the Moonlight - musicbulletinboards.net

    Dancing in the Moonlight - musicbulletinboards.net

    With its light, light, light. Tonight, night, night. I'm moving in the night light With shadows all around. I'm swaying in the warm breeze And it's lifting my feet up off the ground. I'm dancing in the moonlight With moonbeams...
  • Main Title: Content can span up to two lines using Arial Bold ...

    Main Title: Content can span up to two lines using Arial Bold ...

    * DND/CF Policy and Guidelines on Harassment Prevention and Resolution review DAOD 5012 and Guidelines Changes in the TBS Policy Directive are in most part already included in the current DAOD or Guidelines. Only an update will be required to...
  • Level I Sales Comparison Part A

    Level I Sales Comparison Part A

    Sales Comparison Approach. The Sales Comparison Approach uses sales prices as evidence of the value of similar properties. The price at which a particular property sells is the price determined by the interaction of supply and demand at the time...
  • Twenty-Two Interesting Ways* to use Twitter in the

    Twenty-Two Interesting Ways* to use Twitter in the

    Twenty-Two Interesting Ways* to use Twitter in the Classroom *and tips This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 3.0 License.
  • Elected Officials  Senator Jerry Hill, 13th District Mayor

    Elected Officials Senator Jerry Hill, 13th District Mayor

    Follow us on: Follow us on: I'd like to start by welcoming the elective officials who will be joining us today…please stand up If there is an elected official I did not mentio