Context for Value Capture & Org Kickoff

Context for Value Capture & Org Kickoff

TROY DAVIS AND THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT Gautam Narula Author, Remain Free Lincoln-Sudbury High School May 22, 2017 Amendment VIII to the US Constitution Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. 2

History of the Eighth Amendment That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted; - English Bill of Rights (1689) That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. Virginia Declaration of Rights, Section IX (1776) What says our [Virginia] bill of rights?that excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.. . . Will [Congress] find sentiments there similar to this bill of rights?. . . But Congress. . . may introduce the practice of France, Spain, and Germany--of

torturing, to extort a confession of the crime. Patrick Henry, Debate in Virginia Ratifying Convention (1788) 3 The Eighth Amendment and Capital Punishment Equal protection and Due Process clauses of the 14th Amendment allows the Eighth Amendment to be applied to state laws Wilkerson v Utah (1879): Execution by firing squad doesnt violate the Eighth Amendment Furman v Georgia (1972): Inconsistent/arbitrary death penalty application violates the Eighth Amendment; moratorium on death penalty in the United States Gregg v Georgia (1976): The death penalty itself doesnt violate the Eighth Amendment as long as certain procedures are followed; ended moratorium Coker v Georgia (1977): Execution for rape (of an adult) violates the eighth amendment

Edmund v Florida (1982): Executing someone who didnt intend to kill violates the eighth amendment Ford v. Wainright (1986): Executing the insane violates the eight amendment Thompson v. Oklahoma (1988): Executions for crimes committed before the age of 16 is cruel and unusual Stanford v Kentucky (1989): Eighth amendment permits executing people for crime committed at ages 16 and 17. Penry v Lynaugh (1989): Permissible to execute the mentally retarded Atkins v Virginia (2002): Overturned Penry, unconstitutional to execute the mentally retarded Roper v Simmons (2005): Overturned Stanford, unconstitutional to execute for crime committed by minors Kennedy v Louisiana (2008): Execution for rape (of a child) violates the eighth amendment; cannot execute for crimes that didnt result in death unless they were crimes against the state (espionage, treason, etc) Baze v Rees (2008): Upheld constitutionality of Kentuckys lethal injection regime 4 Death Penalty Trends Source: Death Penalty Information Center

5 What is Cruel and Unusual? Justice Brennan, Furman v Georgia (1972) A punishment must not by its severity be degrading to human dignity, "A severe punishment that is obviously inflicted in wholly arbitrary fashion.

"A severe punishment that is clearly and totally rejected throughout society. "A severe punishment that is patently unnecessary." 6 Who Determines Cruel and Unusual? Chief Justice Warren, Trop v. Dulles (1958)

The [Eighth] Amendment must draw its meaning from the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society." Abolition strategy based on Evolving Standards 7 Originalists vs. Evolving Standards Justice Scalia, Thompson v. Oklahoma (1988) [T]he risk of assessing evolving standards is that it is all too easy to believe that evolution has culminated in

ones own views. The Eighth Amendmentmeanswhat we consider cruel today; otherwise we have no protection against the moral perceptions of a future, more brutal generation. It isrooted in the moral perceptions of the time. On this analysiscapital punishment, which was widely in use in 1791, does not violate the abstract principle of the Eighth Amendment. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (1998) Justice Clarence Thomas (stay tuned) 8 Davis v. Georgia

Davis v. Georgia, Petition for Writ of Certiorari (2008) Mr. Davis request for an evidentiary hearing sharply split the Supreme Court of Georgia. [S]even of nine State witnesses have recanted their trial testimony, and several new witnesses have identified or implicated a different individual, Redd Coles, as the shooterDoes the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution create a substantive right of the innocent not to be executedwhen substantial evidence of innocence is discovered? Mr. Davis case allows this Court an opportunity to determine what it has only before assumed: that the execution of an innocent man is constitutionally abhorrent. The Court need only determine if the Eighth Amendment bars execution of the innocent and then decidewhether Georgiasprocedures afford sufficient due process protection. 9 My Involvement

Gautam Narula, Letter to Troy Davis (2008) [w]hat I found most chilling was Mondays Georgia Supreme Court decision to deny you a stay of execution, on the grounds that it wasnt in their jurisdiction. What if the Supreme Court hadnt called an emergency session on Tuesday? ...[W]hy was the State in such a rush to execute you, instead of waiting six more days for the Supreme Court decision? 10 Savannah Hearing

Gautam Narula, Clearly Established Innocence: An Account of the Troy Davis Hearing (2010) Is it constitutional to execute a person who has proven their innocence, as long as that person had received a fair trial? While this question obviously sounds absurd, it was in fact a legitimate legal question in the hearing, and Judge Moore noted that the Supreme Court has repeatedly deflected such questions over the past two decades 11

Savannah Hearing (2) Judge Moore, In re Troy Anthony Davis (2010) [W]hile Mr. Davis's new evidence casts some additional, minimal doubt on his conviction, it is largely smoke and mirrors. [T]his court concludes that executing an innocent person would violate the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. However, Mr. Davis is not innocent the Court is left with the firm conviction that while the State's case may not be ironclad, most reasonable jurors would again vote to convict Mr. Davis 12

September 21, 2011 Supreme Court denies stay of execution 13 Impact Letter to Troy Davis, September 15, 2011 I wanted to write to you in case the unthinkable happens, and this is our last communication. I first want to thank you for all that you've done for me. When I was fifteen years old, I was a very different person. I supported the death penalty and brushed aside the possibility of an innocent person being executed. I had no more than a mild interest in human

rights or social justiceI believed I had the moral authority to say who was beyond redemption and deserved to die. I obviously don't think like that anymore, and it's because I met you. I also wanted to make a promise to you. My promise is that, regardless of what may happen in the coming few weeks, I won't forget that there are other Troy Davises out there. I promise that I won't sit back when I see an injustice occur. I promise that I won't stop working to end the death penalty once and for all in the United States. I promise that, for the rest of my life, I Am Troy Davis. 15 Impact (2) Letter to Gautam Narula, September 18, 2011 How's my nephew holding up these days? I heard you and

Pranavi were at the rally Friday evening. I'm glad to know you were able to make it. Give everyone my love for me. You already know I'm proud of you but stay focused on the direction you want your life to go. Every decision today directs your tomorrow. I want you to enjoy your youth but don't forget to consistently tell those you love what they mean to you. Well my back meds are kicking in anddisrupting my thoughts somewhat so take care and remain prayerful. Remember that in life we don't always get what we want but even when faced with the worst of times, God will open a window of hope and a door to prosperity. 16 Clarence Thomas

Meeting with Justice Thomas, 2012 Wasnt the binary choice between execution and freedom, with no middle ground (life in prison) for establishing doubt, a failure of our justice system? Isnt Cruel and Unusual is inherently subjective? Wont Troy Daviss execution someday be seen as a violation of the Eighth Amendment? 17 Questions

Why did the Supreme Court deflect questions about the execution of innocents? Is Cruel and Unusual an evolving standard? How should we measure what our current standards are? Or are Justices Thomas and Scalia right when they say it should be interpreted based on American standards in 1791? Is it Cruel and Unusual to execute those whove demonstrated at least a minimal level of doubt, even if they cant prove innocence? Should capital punishment be addressed at the state level (Clarence Thomas), or at the federal level? Is capital punishment Cruel and Unusual punishment?

18 For More Information Resources ( [email protected] Remain Free available on Amazon, LS

library 19

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • RGP (Lester Sussman and David Mathews) Vendor Risk Management

    RGP (Lester Sussman and David Mathews) Vendor Risk Management

    The Impact of Risk - Failures in VRM. This document is the proprietary and confidential property of Resources Global Professionals. Global Bank- $35 million penalty plus restitution to Customers for Unfair Billing Practices and deceptive marketing by one of its...
  • Diapositive 1 -

    Diapositive 1 -

    Associations naturalistes : Saiak, LPO-Aquitaine, Organbidexka Col Libre, GEOB Nature Midi-Pyrénées, Nature Comminges, Association des Naturalistes de l'Ariège, Cerca Nature, Groupe Ornithologique du Roussillon, LPO-Aude Etablissements publics : Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage ; Office...
  • WRIA 9 Watershed Ecosystem Forum Adaptive Management Plan

    WRIA 9 Watershed Ecosystem Forum Adaptive Management Plan

    LW density had lowest in Lower Duwamish and no jams. LW density had highest in Lower Green, but only two small jams. Upper Green had second highest LW density and highest jam density. Middle Green had lower LW density than...
  • Berlioz: Harold in Italy Mvt. iii - Weebly

    Berlioz: Harold in Italy Mvt. iii - Weebly

    Berlioz: Harold in Italy Mvt. iii. In 1822 he started to study music, abandoning his medical studies in 1824. Unusually, he lacked the traditional keyboard skills of his contemporaries and famous composers of the Classical and Baroque eras.
  • Built for Zero - The Planning Council

    Built for Zero - The Planning Council

    Built for Zero. Built for Zero is a movement of 120 communities.. working. to end homelessness, across the US and around the world.. Built for Zero, formally Zero: 2016, is a national change effort working to help a core group...
  • Recommending a Strategy - CFM

    Recommending a Strategy - CFM

    Unmodified Opinion on the Governmental Activities, General Fund, Elementary Retirement, and Aggregate Remaining Fund Information: In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities ...
  • British North America

    British North America

    After the Battle of the Plains of Abraham, France signed away their North American empire. Under the terms of the Treaty of Paris, the French gave up control of: Canada (really, the St Laurence heartland) The rest of Acadia (including...
  • Inventories: IAS 2 - ICPAK

    Inventories: IAS 2 - ICPAK

    Specifics: restated items cannot be reported at amounts greater than their recoverable amount restated inventory is reduced to a lower net realizable value gain or loss on the entity's net monetary position is included in profit or loss and is...