Family Family Influences Influences Upon Upon Learning Learning Group Group Investigation Investigation Project Project EDP 603, Summer III August 3, 2005 Beth Arnos, Kristin Bixby, Angie
Cowan & Chris Tickle Table of Contents: Overview Birth Order Parent Education
Values Family Structure Conclusion Overview: Role of Family in Learning: Birth Order Parent Education
Family Values Family Structure The classroom is an opportunity for teachers to look at the family dynamics of each student and determine ways to assist the child with regard to these factors. Birth Order: Intelligence:
Zanjunc & Markus (1975) Sample of 350,000 males Later born, lower IQ test score Based on Household Intellectual Climate Only-child & last-born phenomenon Limitations Birth Order: Implications for Cooperative Learning: Typical Personality Traits by Birth Order
(Dreikurs, 1958; Morales, 1994) Only Child- Unfamiliar with relating to other children, shy, not used to competition, lacks opportunities to learn how to successfully share, selfish. First Born- Most favorable position, entrusted with power and responsibility, positive self-esteem, confidence, has tutoring/teaching opportunity at home responds with hostility towards second child, feels status is threatened when second child is born Birth Order: Typical Personality Traits by Birth Order (cont.)
Middle Child- More relaxed, even tempered, less driven by parents, sometimes develops sense of humor to obtain attention, becomes more extrovertedcould develop low self-esteem, could develop feelings of inferiority. Youngest Child- More sociable, friendly, less demanding, less jealous, develops skills such as accommodation, tolerance, becomes more popular If too pampered, can feel weak and develop feeling of inferiority, not entrusted with responsibilityseeks situations free of competition, shies away from tasks for fear of failure.
Birth Order: Children arrive at school expecting that their classmates will behave like their siblings, their teachers like their parents (Romeo, 1994). Teachers should choose roles and groups based on a balance between the skills the child has and the skills the child needs to acquire, based on birth order (Morales, 1994). Parent Education: Duncan & Magnusan (2005)
Higher test scores Dearing et al. (2005) Parent involvement Davis-Kean (2005) Parent education in relation to child achievement Parent Education: Parent education and involvement affect the student in three main ways:
Instruction (cognitive ability) Modeling (social cognitive theory) Reinforcement (behaviorism) Family Values: Behaviorism Reinforced behaviors (in early childhood) related to values Anglo Americans values promote autonomy of children to a greater degree than Latinos (Puerto Ricans and Mexicans, reportedly) this has the effect on Latino students of lack of competition for teacher attention, lack of competition
with peers, and lower self-efficacy Competition & self-efficacy are thought to help children achieve in Anglo-American based school systems *Though Latinos value this as a form of unhealthy pride Family Values: Autonomy: Latinos(Puerto Ricans and Mexicans) Native Americans (Hupa Tribe in Ca.) In two studies, these three groups demonstrated a value for conformity in their young children. Autonomy was only valued by parents if that meant
the parents value system was going to be reinforced (autonomy with regard to peers) Bachtold (1982) study involved California residents and preschool children of Anglo-American heritage and Hupa Native American heritage Hupa desired their children to learn new ways and prosper more than previous generations Hupa embedded values were transmitted earlier than six years of age Hupa children conformed early to transactions of intimacy and cooperation that are consistent with the Hupa values
altruism in their culture circumvented development of autonomy, assertiveness and competition which leads to seeking of attention and goal orientation in their Anglo-American counterparts Family Values: Literacy: One study reviewed 3 decades of data from Detroit Mi., including religious and ethnic diverse populations Catholics showed the greatest change in values increase in parental valuation of autonomy for children and a decrease in preference for obedience,
from 1958 to 1983 Approx. 25% - 30% of the differential change in the (entire study population) parental values (e.g., valuation of autonomy) was attributed to increased educational levels in Detroit Catholic parents Alwin (1984) Family Values: Parenting Style: Parental involvement in homework as an intersection of family literacy, SES, social support for the student Parents homework involvement influenced student
academic success when parental modeling, reinforcement and instruction supported student attitudes about homework, student perceptions of competence and student self-regulatory skills (HooverDempsey et al., 2001) Behaviorist views are supported in the findings, where the parental involvement served to reinforce childrens attitudes and self-regulatory skills Social cognitive theory is also supported due to the positive outcomes that resulted from parental modeling and parental support of students perceptions of competence Family Values: Parenting Style: 2ndary outcome - peer group
Durbin, et al.(1993) examined an association between peer group orientation and parenting style among European-American high school adolescents - teens reported on the style authoritative (students were oriented toward balanced peers that rewarded both adult&peervalues, e.g., "jocks," "the in crowd," and "brains") authoritarian (no data trend) indulgent (fun-culture orientation, "partiers") uninvolved (mostly girls; some boys, oriented toward crowds that didnt endorse adult values (e.g., "druggies") Family Values:
Parenting Style: Disparity between teens expectation of the onset of more autonomy, compared with their parents expectation-values created a secondary effect Decreased interest in parent value system Promoted student attachment to peer values Depending on the peers selected, delinquent behavior resulted (a distraction from school and learning) Researchers think the the greater the teens PERCEPTION of disparity between the parent/teen values caused maladjustment in teens
Family Structure: Family Background Ford et al. 1998 Students from two-parent families were more likely to be identified as gifted, than those from single-parent families. Projections suggest that more than half of the children born in the U.S. in the 1990s will spend some of their childhood in single-parent families, (Pong, 1997). Family Structure: Affects of divorce on children
Two years Malone et al. (2004) Kindergarten through grade 9 Tracked students behavior of parents who were married in kindergarten Boys vs. Girls behaviors Family Structure: Implications for Teachers: Assumptions that students have two biological parents Look for acting-out behavior, especially with
boys. Understand that this is normal Frieman (1997) explain to the student that, that behavior is unacceptable and emphasize to them that they are liked and valued (Maslow) Family Structure: Single-Parent Homes: Difficult to monitor after-school activities (lack of modeling) Lower income (typically) Traditional families are at more of an advantage when it comes to meeting Maslows hierarchy of
needs, (Ormrod, 2004). Family Structure: Maslows Hierarchy of Needs (in relation to divorce): People need to feel safe in their environment (regardless of where that may be) People need to feel love and belongingness (affectionate relationships) People need to feel good about themselves (self-esteem)
Conclusions: Family characteristics are factors in the learning process Families are educators School/teacher/class are educators Teachers have a unique opportunity partner with the family help children learn Improve self-efficacy within students Questions? Questions?
