Longitudinal Examination of Depression and Negative Feedback ...

Longitudinal Examination of Depression and Negative Feedback ...

Rejection Sensitivity as a Moderator of Links Between Early
Adolescent Peer Experiences and Later Problem Behavior Trajectories
Joseph S. Tan, Emily G. Marston, Christopher A. Hafen, Joanna M. Chango, & Joseph P. Allen

University of Virginia

.

We would like to thank the National Institute of Child Health & Human Development
for funding awarded to Joseph P. Allen, Principal Investigator, (9 R01 HD058305-A11) for funding to conduct this study as well as for the write-up of this study.

Introduction
For adolescents, engaging in problem behaviors (e.g. soft drug
use, externalizing behaviors) is normative.
By adulthood, most individuals decline in engagement in these
behaviors.
Adolescent experiences with peers such as peer influence,
peer rejection, and friendship quality have been shown to play
a role in problem behaviors persisting from adolescence into
adulthood.
A question of importance for intervention and prevention
efforts is: For which individuals do negative peer experiences
predict problem behavior persistence?
Rejection sensitivity, an individuals propensity to perceive
potentially rejecting situations as rejecting, may be a key
moderator of the relationship between negative peer
experiences and problem behavior trajectories.
Adolescents sensitive to rejection may persist in engaging in
problem behaviors because of a greater susceptibility to peer
pressure, well as a diminished capability to regulate emotions.
In this longitudinal, multi-method study, we examine the
hypothesis that rejection sensitivity moderates the
relationship between early adolescent peer experiences and
later soft drug use and externalizing behavior trajectories.

Method
Participants
Participants were 184 individuals assessed annually from age 13
to 24.
Assessments were multi-method, including interview,
observational, peer-report, and parent-report data
The sample was 63% European-American, 27% AfricanAmerican, and 14% mixed race or other race/ethnicities.
Baseline median family income was in the $40,000 to $59,000
range

Measures
For externalizing behaviors, rejection sensitivity moderated the
Peer experiences were assessed between ages 13
relationship between dyadic negativity and initial levels of
and 15 through a variety of measures. Adolescents
externalizing behaviors during adolescence (Figure 1). Rejection
and their best friends reported on dyadic friendship
sensitivity served as a risk factor for adolescents with more
quality (Friendship Quality Questionnaire; Parker &
dyadic negativity.
Asher, 1993), popularity was assessed through
sociometric nomination procedures, and dyadic
negativity and communication were observed
Figure 1. Rejection Sensitivity as a Moderator of Links between Adolescent Peer Experiences and Problem Behavior
through a behavioral task.
Soft Drug Use
Externalizing
16-24

Rejection sensitivity was assessed repeatedly from
ages 16 through 18 with the Rejection Sensitivity
Questionnaire (Downey & Feldman, 1996).
Soft drug use (Alcohol and Drug Use
Questionnaire; Johnston, O'Malley, & Bachman,
1987) was assessed repeatedly from ages 16 to 24
through self-report.
Externalizing behaviors (Child Behavior Checklist;
Achenbach, 1991; Adult Behavior Checklist;
Achenbach & Rescorla, 2003) were assessed
repeatedly from ages 16 to 24 through peer and
parent report.

Results
Analyses with conditional latent growth curve
suggested that rejection sensitivity moderates the
associations between specific peer experiences in
adolescence and later problem behavior
trajectories.
For soft drug use, rejection sensitivity moderated
the relationship between popularity and initial
levels of soft drug use and the relationship between
communication and growth in drug use (Figure 1).
Rejection sensitivity served as a protective factor
for popular adolescents and a risk factor for
adolescents with poor communication.

I

16-24

Linear
S

I

Linear
S
-.19*

-.25*
-.17*
Friendship Quality
X Rejection Sensitivity

Popularity X
Rejection Sensitivity

Negativity X
Rejection Sensitivity

Communication X
Rejection Sensitivity

Conclusions
For adolescents with negative peer experiences, rejection
sensitivity functions as a risk factor for persistence in
externalizing behavior engagement.
For socially-challenged adolescents, rejection sensitivity
serves as a risk factor for persistence in soft drug use, but for
socially-successful adolescents, rejection sensitivity serves as a
protective factor for soft drug use.
Engaging in problem behaviors may serve as a maladaptive
coping mechanism or a way to avoid negative social outcomes
for those with negative peer experiences in early adolescence.

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Byte out of Bits - DALI by Design

    Byte out of Bits - DALI by Design

    Taking the Byte out of Bits: Lighting Design, Installation, and Operation in the Digital Age Seminar #21 May 7, 2003 4:00 PM Richard Miller - RNM Engineering Wayne Morrow - Starfield Controls How we got here and why general lighting...
  • REL. III- MORALITY Foundations- Part 2  The Book

    REL. III- MORALITY Foundations- Part 2 The Book

    "Ecclesiastes is the one book in the Bible that modern man needs most to read, for it is Lesson One, and the rest of the Bible is Lesson Two, and modernity does not heed Lesson Two because it does not...
  • New Jersey Board of Bar Examiners and Committee on Character

    New Jersey Board of Bar Examiners and Committee on Character

    BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS AND COMMITTEE ON CHARACTER Mary Patterson, Assistant Secretary Sahbra Smook Jacobs, Counsel to the Committee on Character New Jersey is now a Uniform Bar Examination (UBE) Jurisdiction The New Jersey Supreme Court adopted the UBE, effective...
  • Introductory Chemistry: Concepts & Connections 4th Edition by ...

    Introductory Chemistry: Concepts & Connections 4th Edition by ...

    An example is density problems. mass volume density = Algebraic Analysis Example What is the mass of 22.5 cm3 of iron metal with a density of 7.874 g/cm3? m 22.5 cm3 7.874 g/cm3 = m = (22.5 cm3) × 7.874...
  • Killer Scenarios with Data Lake in Azure

    Killer Scenarios with Data Lake in Azure

    Killer Scenarios with Data Lake in Azure with U-SQL. ... Schema on read on file and file sets. C# extensibility. SQL with U-SQL. Script level execution and optimization. Tool usage. ... Always accessible system namespaces: U-SQL specific (e.g., for SQL.MAP)...
  • The Roadmap To College - Forest Hills High School

    The Roadmap To College - Forest Hills High School

    Top 5 things to consider when making a great college bound timeline. Extracurricular activities - When does your schedule lighten up?That is the best time to prep. Which test are you taking? - If you are taking AP exams and...
  • Rotary Club of Westfield-Mayville PolioPlus Challenge A presentation

    Rotary Club of Westfield-Mayville PolioPlus Challenge A presentation

    Here is the multiplying effect on our dollars from the two available matches. Each $1 we raise is matched by one from this foundation up to $10,000.
  • Video - Las Positas College

    Video - Las Positas College

    Magnetically stored data lasts years, even decades, before deteriorating. Magnetic storage, in the form of a hard disk drive, provides an inexpensive, high-capacity form of permanent storage that acts as the main storage medium for most computer users.