Visual Development & Amblyopia Adlers Physiology of the
Visual Development & Amblyopia Adlers Physiology of the Eye 10th Ed. Chapter 21- Development of Vision in Infancy Chapter 27 - Activity-Dependent Development of Retinogeniculate Projections Chapter 31 - Visual Deprivation Human Amblyopia - Some current issues Visual Development: Hierarchical Model of Vision
Visual Development: Development of Contrast Sensitivity Peak temporal frequency (low spatial frequency) VEP DEM FPL
Visual Development: Development of Contrast Sensitivity Peak spatial frequency (low temporal frequency) Sweep VEP Grating Acuity Visual Development:
FPL (open) VEP (solid) Visual Development: Binocular Vision FPL Global stereopsis emerges at 3-5 mo
Global stereopsis improves 8 fold in first year Protracted development of adult values Facts and Figures Brain Weight: Doubles in 9 mo/90% by 6 yr
Cortical Thickness: Neuronal Density: V1 6 mo/parietal 12 yr/temporal 16 yr V1 5 mo/frontal 7 yr Synaptic Density: V1 peaks 4 mo then declines to 11yr frontal peaks 1 yr then declines to 16yr
Cortical Metabolism: Peaks 4 yr then declines to 15yr White Matter: Peaks 2 yr and continues to 30 yrs Regionally Specific and Non-Linear Gross Cortical Development lissencephalic
Regionally Specific Growth loss Ages 5-11 gain Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Leonard CM, Welcome SE, Kan E, Toga AW.
Longitudinal mapping of cortical thickness and brain growth in normal children. J Neurosci. 2004 Sep 22;24(38):8223-31. Visual Behaviors Follow Distinct Time Courses Critical periods Visual Cortex Development: Multiple Stages
Light Light First Binocular Stage Visual Cortex Development: Retinal Waves
Serve to fine tune local specificy For eye of origin, retinotopy, on/off Visual Cortex Development: Retinogeniculate Prenatal, uses Spontaneous activity Visual Cortex Development:
Summary for Review This is for layer 4c Human Amblyopia Lazy Eye
Relatively common developmental visual disorder Reduced visual acuity in an otherwise healthy and properly corrected eye
Associated with interruption of normal early visual experience Affects at least 2% of North American population Most common cause of vision loss in children
Well characterized behaviorally, not neurologically Treated by patching in children Visual Deficits in Amblyopia Reduced visual acuity - defining feature
Impaired contrast sensitivity Prominent at high spatial frequencies Central visual field is generally most affected Contrast Sensitivity
Usually 20/30 - 20/60 Spatial Frequency Moderate deficits in object segmentation/recognition and spatial localization Severe deficits in binocular interactions Subtypes of Amblyopia
Anisometropic Unequal refractive error between the two eyes Strabismic Deviated eye that may or may not have unbalanced refraction Deprivation Congenital cataract; corneal opacity; eyelid masses
Mechanisms of Amblyopia 1. Form deprivation Sharp image is not formed at the retina 2. Abnormal binocular vision
Binocularity is often changed or lost in amblyopia Suppression may be necessary to avoid double vision Models of Amblyopia Competition hypothesis originated with experiments in kittens in the 1960s by Hubel and Wiesel Monocular deprivation of retinal input during critical
developmental periods leads to striking abnormalities in the physiology of visual cortical neurons Binocular deprivation actually leads to less severe abnormalities Amblyopia may be a form of activity-dependent deprivation, modulated by competitive interactions Site of abnormality Primary visual cortex and beyond
Loss of disparity sensitivity and binocular suppression in V1 (primary visual cortex) Although loss in V1 cant explain the full abnormality - extrastriate is implicated. Barnes et al. showed with fMRI abnormalities in many visual areas beyond V1. Hypothesized that feedback connections from extrastriate
to V1 may be a primary source of abnormality. Current Issues Abiding debate about how the strabismic and anisometropic subtypes differ from each other. Chicken and egg situation : Is amblyopia a consequence or a cause of strabismus/ anisometropia ? The relationship between performance on monocular versus binocular tests has not been well-studied.
Hypothesis Impairment in binocular functions may predict the pattern of monocular deficits, and thereby help explain the mechanisms (McKee, Movshon & Levi, 2003). Subjects 20 adults (age 19-35) N
Age Years of education Near acuity normal or fellow
Near acuity amblyopia Control 7 25.1 13.7
20/18 - Strabismics 6 26.3
13.5 20/20 61*^ Anisometropes 7
28 14.9 20/23 61*^ Most Subjects have a history of patch treatment in their childhood.
Complete ophthalmologic examination was done to confirm diagnosis General Methods Seven psychophysical Tests Monocular Tests Amblyopic and fellow eye of amblyopic subjects tested separately Stronger and weaker eye of normal subjects tested separately Binocular Tests Both eyes tested simultaneously - required careful stimulus alignment
It is difficult to achieve precise alignment of stimuli in the two eyes, and we pioneered new methods for achieving this using methods that are compatible with fMRI. Experiments Monocular tests
Binocular contrast integration Summary - Monocular Functions Amblyopic eyes showed a deficit for all the monocular functions tested. Strabismic amblyopes are distinguished from anisometropic amblyopes by their severe loss of Vernier acuity. Vernier acuity
Measures the relative position of an object Much finer than Snellen or grating acuity (6-10 arc-sec of visual angle) In our normal subjects Vernier is 12 times better than grating acuity A type of hyperacuity Hyperacuity
photoreceptor = www.cnl.salk.edu/~thomas/ vernier.html Binocular Tests - Methods Dichoptic Stimulation with Avotec Eye Tracking with Avotec/SMI
System Stimulus Alignment Via Perceptual Report Stimulus Alignment Via Fovea Reflex Dual Eye Tracking Alternate Cover Test Summary - Binocular Functions
Stereopsis Reduced in amblyopes, especially strabismics Binocular motion integration Binocular perception impaired in amblyopes, especially strabismics Can binocularity predict Vernier acuity?
Re-classification We reclassified amblyopes based on binocular properties. A simple pass/fail criterion was used to classify. The subjects who passed both randot stereoacuity test and binocular motion integration were assigned binocular (33% strabismics and 57% anisometropes passed the criteria). Those who couldnt pass were assigned non-binocular Result
Deficits in Vernier acuity are much more severe in non-binocular group as compared to binocular. Performance in non-binocular subgroup can not be predicted the by snellen/grating acuities - suggesting additional factors. Implications Vernier performance is better predicted by residual binocularity than by clinical subtype.
Interocular suppression may be an important etiological factor in the development of amblyopia (e.g., Sireteanu, 1980; Agrawal et al., 2006). Future Directions fMRI experiments that study amblyopic binocular suppression directly, perhaps in comparison with binocular rivalry in normal subjects.
The Aerospace Corporation Space Science Applications Laboratory ... during a relatively weak outer zone enhancement 9/1/2011 to 9/1/2014 RPS-B * RPS Extended Mission Items RPS measurement of total ionizing dose is an important contribution to questions about vehicle health ~6.7...
Metrics - How Should We Evaluate EV Batteries. US Advanced Battery Consortium has laid out goals for commercialization by 2020. Evaluation points include: energy density, power density, cycle life, safety, cost, and charging speed.
Quantum Home Contract: SILVER Quantum Home Contract: GOLD Quantum Home Contract: Platinum Quantum Home Contract: Platinum Plus Examples of New Optional Endorsements Slide 21 Expanded Underwriting Expanded Pricing Expanded Capability: Updates in Protection Class Rating Platinum Plus Coverages Reasons Customers...
OSI Model CS363-Winter 1999 DePaul University Group Project Info Teams formed and on the web Cases Working in Groups Last half of class tonight reserved for projects Review #1 You must connect a research institution's main offices with the testing...
Example 1: glycerol is one type of monomer, fatty acid is a different type so this is a macromolecule but not a polymer. Example 2:peptides are both macromolecules and polymers since they are very large and all the monomers are...
Picture on left shows them unloading a truck. On right, young boys carrying 30 lb boxes on their heads. Other delivery stories - opening up boxes and packing them around the driver of a van, leaving him just enough room...
Ready to download the document? Go ahead and hit continue!