CDI and Coder Collaboration Maximizing Documentation Quality and

CDI and Coder Collaboration Maximizing Documentation Quality and

CDI and Coder Collaboration Maximizing Documentation Quality and Revenues Andy Tolep, CCS, CCDS, CPC April 30, 2016 Agenda Program Overview CDI Program objectives Importance of quality documentation Coding role in accurate and quality reporting Regulatory Impact to CDI Coder collaboration Explanation of the APR-DRG system Risk adjustment Impact on CDI, coding, and quality measures

Case studies Demonstrate the value of improved collaboration to maximize quality and optimize revenue Importance of the ongoing evolution in the relationship among CDI, Coding, and quality staffs. 2 What is CDI? Reference : Guidance for Clinical Documentation Improvement Programs http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_047343.hcsp?dDocNa me=bok1_047343 CDI Professionals are responsible for: Provider Documentation Completeness and specificity Knowledge of clinical documentation requirements: Clinical indicators for common inpatient diagnoses/comorbidities

ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS coding guidelines MS-DRG assignment and other reimbursement methodologies Present On Admission (POA) documentation for medical/surgical complications and other hospital-acquired conditions Education Providers and medical leadership regarding documentation guidelines 3 Current State Clearly defined CDI program and goals - not so much Many facilities have no clearly defined CDI goals No formal CDI program CDI objectives vary from one facility to another. ACDIS roadmap: Pre-Implementation http://www.hcpro.com/acdis/cdi_roadmap_phase1.cfm Implementation

http://www.hcpro.com/acdis/cdi_roadmap_phase2.cfm Clinical documentation impacts the work of many hospital departments. 4 Why is this important? Payments will be adjusted for physicians, as well as hospitals ACA mandate - Value-Based Payment Physician Fee Schedule January 26, 2015 HHS Secretary announced timeline for Medicare (and the healthcare system at large) to pay physicians based upon the quality, rather than the quantity of care they give their patients October 1, 2016 - 85% of Medicare payments tied to quality (based on 2015 data and earlier) October 1, 2018 - 90% of Medicare payments tied to quality Provider reimbursements will be adjusted based on cost and quality

Cost / Quality Low Quality Average Quality High Quality Low Cost 0.0% increase/decrease 4.89% increase 9.78% increase Average Cost

0.5% decrease 0.0% increase/decrease 4.89% increase High Cost 1% decrease 0.5% decrease 0.0% increase/decrease 5 APR-DRGs and Risk Adjustment Introduction to APR DRGs

MS-DRGs Severity-based system that assigns a reimbursement level based on principal diagnosis, principal procedure, and up to 3 levels of severity It only takes one secondary diagnosis to shift the MS-DRG into one of those three assignments Utilized by Medicare in every state and some commercial payers. APR-DRGs All secondary diagnoses are incorporated into the decision of the APR-DRG assignment. Adjusts for severity of illness (SOI)

Calculates a risk of mortality (ROM) Utilized by many Medicaid payers and some commercial payers 7 APR-DRG Utilization by State as of 2015 8 Summary of APR DRGs 25 MDCs MDC

Severity of Illness is used for payment Subdivide each base APR 315 base APR DRGs DRG into subclasses (v33) Four Severity of Illness Subclasses Four Risk of Mortality Subclasses 1.

Minor 1. Minor 2. Moderate 2. Moderate 3. Major

3. Major 4. Extreme 4. Extreme 1260 Subclasses 3M 2009. All rights reserved. 1260 Subclasses 9

SOI example of impact on APR-DRG SOI scores change as a secondary diagnosis of diabetes progresses through various stages: Uncomplicated diabetes: SOI 1 Diabetes with renal manifestations: SOI 2 Diabetes with ketoacidosis: SOI 3 Diabetes with hyperosmolar coma: SOI 4 10 ROM example of impact on APR-DRG

ROM scores change as a secondary diagnosis of cardiac dysrhythmia progresses through various stages: Premature beats: ROM 1 (minor) Sick sinus syndrome: ROM 2 (moderate) Paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia: ROM 3 (major) Ventricular fibrillation: ROM 4 (severe) 11 Risk-Adjustment Why Good Documentation Matters Risk Adjustment levels playing field: Sicker

patients are expected to have worse outcomes Strong collaboration among coders and CDI staff Ensures appropriate risk adjustment 12 GMLOS Also Impacts Reimbursement GMLOS=Geometric Mean Length of Stay Why Good Documentation Matters Advance in technology and quality of care GMLOS decreases for Total Joint Replacement Many hospitals

currently targeting 2 day LOS for TJR The target for TJR was 5 days in 2000 The target for TJR was 4 days in 2010 Decreased LOS leads to decreased facility costs 13 Case Studies Case Study: Bringing it all Together Pneumonia Background:

79 y/o male brought to the ED by family due to weakness, increased sleeping, fever and recent 30 lb weight loss. Pt lives at nursing home PMH includes diet-controlled diabetes, hypothyroidism Hx of heavy drinking but quit in 2007 Clinical Findings: VS: Temp 37.3, heart rate 96, BP 81/46, respiratory rate 20, O2 sat 79% on RA Labs: WBC 11.3, Hgb 13.1, Hct 38, platelets 288, Na 133, K 4.2, BUN 23, creat 0.98, glucose 64, calcium 8.5, Lactate 1.6 Chest x-ray shows new ill defined patchy opacities in right perihilar region and left lower lobe which may represent multifocal pneumonia or multifocal adenocarcinoma 15 Case Study Pneumonia Plan:

o IV Levaquin and Zosyn o PT / OT/ Dietary Consults o Blood cultures Current documented diagnoses: o o o o o Nursing home acquired pneumonia Hypoxia Failure to thrive Hyponatremia Anemia 16

Case Study Pneumonia Current documentation supports: Principle Diagnosis: Pneumonia. Secondary diagnosis: Hypoxia, Hyponatremia, Failure to Thrive MS-DRG: Simple Pneumonia w/o CC/MCC MS-DRG RW SOI ROM GMLOS Reimbursement

195 0.711 2 1 2.8 $10,459.46 Query Opportunity: Respiratory Failure? Clinical documentation supporting the query: O2 Sat on RA, 5L O2 required in ED, decompensated respiratory status, non-rebreather required following admission Malnutrition?

Clinical documentation supporting the query: weakness, 30 lbs unintentional weight loss Complex Pneumonia? Organism being empirically treated by Levaquin and Zosyn? 17 Case Study Pneumonia If queries were addressed in the medical record: Principle Diagnosis: Pneumonia due to presumed pseudomonas and/or gram negative organism MS-DRG: 177 Respiratory Infections and Inflammations with MCC Secondary diagnosis: Aspiration pneumonia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, cachexia, acute respiratory failure Starting Point

MS-DRG RW SOI ROM GMLOS Reimbursement 195 0.711 2

1 2.8 $10,459.46 177 1.9033 4 3 5.1 $19,926.28

Opportunity The higher relative weight the sicker your patient. The higher the SOI the sicker your patient. The higher the ROM the sicker your patient. If the patient expires within 30 days of discharge, which documentation explains the complexity of the patient? 18 Why Good Documentation Matters Public Reporting Programs Rely on Coded Data Why Good Documentation Matters Coders cannot code what is not documented by the provider CMS uses MEDPAR data to calculate an actual/expected ratio for the following programs 30-Day Readmission Program

MCARE reduces hospitals base operating DRG payments to account for excess readmissions in the following DRGs AMI, CHF and Pneumonia, COPD, and Total Joint Replacements Added for 2017: CABG (data collection started in 2015) 30-Day Mortality Measures: Acute myocardial infraction (AMI) Heart failure (HF) Pneumonia (PN) THA/TKA COPD Medicare spending per beneficiary (MSPB) - started 2015 and risk adjusted. All of the programs are adjusted and calculated as ratio of actual versus expected (MEDPAR data) 23 Documentation, Coding, and Quality

Indicators Documentation and PSI Definition of PSI (Patient Safety Indicators) Common documentation and coding issues: For example, clarifying if pressure ulcer was POA when the H&P indicates the skin is intact Clarifying if case of blood stream infection is due to a device or procedure vs. multifactorial in nature 25 Where to Start? PSI 90 is referred to as a composite measure because eight different PSIs are rolled up to provide an overview of hospital performance. The eight PSIs included in the CMS PSI 90 composite measure include:

PSI 03, pressure ulcer PSI 06, iatrogenic pneumothorax PSI 07, central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections PSI 08, postoperative hip fracture PSI 12, postoperative pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis PSI 13, postoperative sepsis PSI 14, postoperative wound dehiscence PSI 15, accidental puncture or laceration 26 PSI 15 Accidental Laceration

CMS defines accidental puncture or laceration (PSI 15) as a complication; a condition, that when present, leads to substantially increased hospital resource use. This includes intensive monitoring, expensive and technically complex services and extensive care requiring a greater number of caregivers. The most common vulnerabilities identified in PSI 15 audits include: Incorrect reporting of dx 998.2 (mapped to many ICD-10 codes) in situations where use of this code is excluded (e.g., incidental durotomy) Incorrect reporting of E codes (now Y codes in ICD-10) Over-reporting dx 998.2 in situations where the puncture or laceration was not accidental and/or was unavoidable due to the patient's anatomy and/or other circumstances (e.g., dense adhesions) Under-reporting dx 998.2 when physicians incorrectly guide the coder not to assign a perforation or laceration as a complication 27 PSI 15 Accidental Laceration Determination of a complication or expected outcome lies with physician

documentation. When a tear or laceration is noted in operative note or progress notes; the physician should be queried as to whether the tear or laceration was an incidental occurrence inherent to the surgical procedure or whether the tear is a complication of the procedure. (Coding Clinic, Third Quarter, 2009, p.5, First Quarter, 2011 pp.13-14) An American College of Surgeons article published in May 2014 ( http://bulletin.facs.org/2014/05/reporting-patient-safety-indicator-15/): 28 Knocking Down the Silos CDS Reporting Structure CDS Reporting Structure (n=290) 21% HIM

Case Management 27% Finance 52% 2015 CDI Week Industry Overview Survey - http:// blogs.hcpro.com/acdis/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/2015-CDI-We ek-Overview-Survey.pdf 30 Areas of CDI Expansion Are you planning to expand your CDI programs concurrent review to additional hospital areas? (n=290) 33% 19% 15%

18% Hospital OP ED Obstetrics Pediatrics Not Expanding 16% 2015 CDI Week Industry Overview Survey http://blogs.hcpro.com/acdis/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/2015-C DI-Week-Overview-Survey.pdf 31 CDI/Coder/Quality Collaboration Coding Managers and CDI Directors should work

together to implement the following processes: Ongoing ICD-10 education is available for coders and CDS staff. DRG discrepancies are reviewed with the coder/CDS on an individual basis and common DRG discrepancies are reviewed with the two teams Coder/CDI queries are modified to meet ICD-10 compliance about 15-20% of the ICD-10-CM guidelines affecting when and how a code is assigned were revised and PCS requires much more specificity (approach, device, body part, etc.) 32 CDI/Coder/Quality Collaboration All HACs are reviewed pre-bill collaboratively by the Coding Manager/CDI Director to ensure the appropriateness of HAC reporting. All DRG denials accepted by the facility are reviewed with the individual coder/ CDS who coded the account and reviewed with the coder/CDS teams

33 ICD-10 Coder/CDI/Quality Meetings Review any trend in DRG or APR-DRG discrepancy between the coding team and the CDS staff. Discuss clinical indicators of commonly targeted CCs/MCCs by RACs (ex. encephalopathy, postoperative respiratory failure, acute cor pulmonale, etc.) Review any recently reported HACs with the coding team, CDS staff, and quality leadership so the facility is in agreement with when a HAC is to be reported. 34 Why Good Documentation Matters As of October 1, 2015, 65 percent of value-based purchasing

(VBP) scores, 25% of the new hospital-acquired conditions (HAC) payment reduction program and 100% of the readmission reduction program scores will be derived from coded data. The composite PSI-90 is of particular importance for VBP and HAC reduction program initiatives. A good starting place: educate CDI and coders on the PSI 90 composite. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality lists ICD-10-CM/PCS equivalent codes for Patient Safety Indicators (PSI) at its website- http:// www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/icd10 35 Summary The key to improved documentation is a successful relationship among coders and CDS staff based on collaboration!! Finance

Coding Team Providers Quality Documentation CDI Team Quality Team 36 Takeaways Work together (Coding, CDI, and Quality) to educate providers on quality documentation to meet ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS coding guidelines. Explain to providers how SOI and ROM will impact their bottom line.

Review reported HACs and PSIs on a regular basis as a team. Educate coding and CDI teams on all DRG denials accepted by the facility. Andy Tolep, CCS, CCDS, CPC MedAssets-Precyse Senior HIM Consultant [email protected] 37 Q&A 38

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Instruction Sets - George Mason University

    Instruction Sets - George Mason University

    Processor Design: Single Clock Cycle per Instruction {CPI = 1} Today's Objective Overall Approach Processor design guides Review of the the MIPS Instruction Formats Further simplification MIPS Subset Instruction Cycle Instruction Fetch Using Register Transfer Notation Decoding Instructions Specify Instructions...
  • 5WS1.6 Edit and revise manuscripts to improve the

    5WS1.6 Edit and revise manuscripts to improve the

    Sentence 1 Sentence 2 Sentence 3 What is something you learned about deleting to revise? APK (Day 2) We have learned that when we delete to revise we take out words or sentences that are not related to the main...
  • Day 1 Speed and Velocity - PC\|MAC

    Day 1 Speed and Velocity - PC\|MAC

    Physics Motion, Speed, and Velocity SC Standards Covered PS-5.1 Explain the relationship among distance, time, direction, and the velocity of an object PS - 5.2 Use the formula v=d/t to solve problems related to average speed or velocity PS -...
  • Insert Page Title hereof Action The Global Programme

    Insert Page Title hereof Action The Global Programme

    Estuaries. Seagrass/ algae beds. Coral reefs. Shelf. ... Arial Wingdings Comic Sans MS Default Design Microsoft Excel Chart Microsoft Word Document Microsoft Excel Worksheet PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation ...
  • Providing Animal Safety and Control in Emergency Pet Shelters

    Providing Animal Safety and Control in Emergency Pet Shelters

    Damp-phlegm Herbal Formula Citrus Chen Pi 8% Pinellia Ban Xia 8% Poria Fu Ling 10% Coix Yi Yi Ren 20% Atractylodes Cang Zhu 8% Areca Da Fu Pi 10% Benincasa Dong Gua Pi 8% Alisma Ze Xie 10% Plantago Che...
  • unswcode.org

    unswcode.org

    PROTOTYPE 1.3. Question. Model State. Introduction. The Aim. Analysis. Prototypes. Evaluation. Implications. Adding conversational commands through keyword recognition.
  • n8prp.org.uk

    n8prp.org.uk

    Professor Nick Fyfe (Chair) Scottish Institute for Policing Research; Sara Thornton. National Police Chiefs' Council. Michael Cunningham QPM. Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) Andy Feist. Home Office. Ian Readhead. ACRO Criminal Records Office.
  • The Challenge: To Create More Value in All Negotiations

    The Challenge: To Create More Value in All Negotiations

    A rough-and-tumble election campaign that never, never ends." —Bruce Philp, Consumer Republic IBM Social Business Markers/2005-2012 *433,000 employees on IBM Connection *26,000 individual blogs *91,000 communities *62,000 wikis *50,000,000 IMs/day *200,000 employees on Facebook *295,000 employees/800,000 followers of the brand...