Presentation EC project - TT

Presentation EC project - TT

HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa EXPERT LEVEL TRAINING ON TELECOM NETWORK COST MODELLING FOR THE HIPSSA REGIONS Arusha 15-19 July, 2013 Christopher Kemei, ITU Expert 1 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Session 3 Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in SubSahara Africa

2 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Agenda Aims and objectives of this session Legal and regulatory framework for tariff regulation Cost accounting and regulatory auditing Costing tools and cost modelling development 3 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa

Aims and objectives 4 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa ITU-EC joint project for Harmonisation of ICT Policies in Sub-Sahara Africa (HIPSSA) has initiated a work on regulatory accounting and cost modelling so as to develop and promote home-grown harmonized policies and regulatory guidelines as well as build human capacity in the field of cost orientation implementation trough the use of appropriate tools. The present session is aimed at providing stakeholders with key indicators of what is done and/or foreseen at the whole region level so as to favour a coherent approach on methodologies all across the region. Relevant information, obtained through questionnaires, refers to: Adopted price control strategies, their implementation, the difficulties encountered and the foreseen evolutions

Implemented procedures regarding cost accounting obligations and associated regulatory auditing processes Costing tool(s) implemented and methodology used to implement the chosen costing tool(s) 5 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa The present document is based on stakeholders feedback to the HIPSSA G5(s) project as detailed below. NRAs feedback to the ITU/HIPSSA G5 questionnaire as of February 28th, 2012 and reported by the regional experts inside their respective regional assessment reports. 34 countries addressed ITU/HIPSSA G5 questionnaire, as presented in the table below: Sub-Region Countries having addressed ITU/HIPSSA G5 questionnaire

No. Central Africa Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo (Republic of The), Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Sao Tome and Principe 8 East Africa Ethiopia, Kenya, Madagascar, Rwanda, Seychelles, Tanzania, Uganda 7 Southern Africa

Botswana, Malawi, Lesotho, Mozambique, South Africa (Republic), Swaziland, Zambia, Zimbabwe 8 West Africa Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea Bissau, Ivory Coast, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Togo 11 In addition, regional experts for East Africa and Southern Africa completed the survey by their own researches for the following countries: Lesotho, Mauritius, Namibia and South Africa. 6

HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa GSMA organization sent, by January 16th 2012, a contribution to ITU/HIPSSA G5 project reflecting its Members position arising from an ad hoc survey internally conducted. The operating groups having participated to the ITU GSMA internal survey were: Airtel, Etisalat Group (Atlantique Telecom), MTN, Orange, Vodacom and Vodafone. GSMA contribution covered the following 22 countries: Sub-Region Central Africa East Africa Southern Africa West Africa Scope of countries covered by GSMA contribution Central African Republic, Chad, Congo (Republic of the), Democratic Republic of Congo,

Gabon Kenya, Madagascar, Seychelles, Tanzania, Uganda Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Republic of South Africa, Zambia Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Niger, Nigeria, Togo No. 5 5 5 7 7 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Legal and regulatory framework for tariff regulation

8 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Price control strategy for MTR Cost orientation adoption across all region. In the EU12, years after the liberalization, cost orientation was implemented in 65% of the countries Cost orientation approach varies across the Sub-Regions, ranging from 43% of respondents from Central Africa to 100% in East Africa.

9 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Legal basis for MTR price control The main legal basis is the law and, to a lesser extent, license terms or both In Senegal, Rwanda*, Niger*, South Africa, Nigeria, Guinea Bissau and Cape Verde, the legal framework states that price control is applicable to operators deemed to have SMP. In terms of regulatory strategic goals, the main concerns expressed by the NRAs are customer interest, especially in terms of price reduction, investments attractions as well as effective and fair

competition promotion. * Source Worldbank Africas ICT Infrastructure - Building on the Mobile Revolution- 2011 10 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Is cost accounting mandated? Cost accounting obligations are provisioned or planned to be for most of the frameworks in place in the region. The prevailing legal basis to impose cost accounting obligation to MNOs is the law and, to a lesser extent operators licenses. Cost accounting obligation is most

provisioned in West Africa representing 77% of the countries having addressed the issue. Southern Africa has the lowest rate. The main reasons for which cost accounting was not mandated, as underlined by NRAs in Southern Africa, are the lack of legal basis as well as the lack of resources and skills. 11 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Is regulatory auditing mandated? Regulatory auditing, is provisioned in the

majority of the respondents representing 68% of the responses. Southern Africa has the lowest rate in parallel (below 40%)with the cost accounting situation presented before and for the same set of reasons 12 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Use of costing tools Costing tools to regulate MTR are used or planned to be used in 72% of the surveyed countries. Central Africa has the lowest proportion of costing tool use and West Africa has

the highest rate. The lack of resources or skills represents 75% of all reasons for which a costing tool is not used or planned to be used by the respondents. 13 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Type of costing tools Bottom up or hybrid models prevail in the region representing 88% of the respondents. The significant use of bottom up approach is attributable to the difficulties to collect data from the operators

Bottom up/Hybrid models are used by 100% of the respondents in West Africa Sub-Region 14 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Level of development of costing tools Costing tools are deemed to exist in half of the countries surveyed But in 39% of them is only at the plan level This result shows the urgent need for capacity building in the Region regarding regulatory accounting and cost modelling.

15 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Difficulties regarding data collection 70% of the respondents reported that they encountered difficulties in collecting data due to the lack of will from operators and, to a lesser extent, the difficulties for operators to provide relevant data. In addition, several operators inside GSMA* underlined the lack of regulatory guidelines regarding cost accounting systems. Such an issue may explain, at least partially, operators unwillingness and internal difficulties to retrieve the

relevant data. * Source : GSMA report on regulatory auditing and cost modelling in SubSahara Africa prepared for the ITU January 2012 16 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Price control of retail services 71% of the respondents reported they use costing tools/cost accounting model to control mobile voice. Most of NRAs use costing tools to control the prices probably whatever the level of competition that prevail in the market.

17 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Price control of wholesale services 54% of the respondents reported they use costing tools/cost accounting model to control bitstream or unbundling prices. Regarding access to the international gateway, 50% of the respondents use such tools. The use of costing tools/cost accounting systems to control wholesale rates is relatively low for services where the incumbent has a quasi-monopolistic situation namely unbundling and bitstream.

18 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Objectives of framework reviews 66,6% of the respondents (out of 21 relevant responses) indicated that a regulatory review is planned or underway The first motivation for the review of the frameworks in the region is cost orientation implementation. For several countries the objectives of the planned/under way framework review concern new challenges brought about by broadband, submarine cables deployments, ICT convergence and NGN

developments. 19 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa New challenges for price control NGN and broadband infrastructures represent more than 50% of the new challenges considered by the NRAs. With the roll out of submarine cable networks and government policies towards broadband growth, NGN are emerging. Gambia, for instance, reported that almost all the operators are deploying NGN networks. The development of cost models is

perceived as a key regulatory strategy to address these new challenges. 20 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Cost accounting and regulatory auditing 21 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Data collection process The best practice consisting in collecting

data on an annual basis is implemented in more than half of the countries having addressed this issue (out of 15 countries). 25% of the respondents mentioned to do so when price changes occur. When cost accounting is mandated the latest data collection process took place in 2011 for almost half of NRAs 22 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Scope of costs and cost preparation The degree of regulatory prescription regarding the scope of cost and cost preparation need to be detailed enough to provide clear guidance for

operators and ensure that cost accounting data are prepared in consistency with price regulation strategic goals (cost orientation, non discrimination, ). The best practice consisting in: Establishing beforehand a cost and revenues nomenclature Imposing a set of specifications on cost preparation methodology Such a practice is in place, among the countries having addressed the questionnaire, in: Botswana, Mozambique, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Kenya, Uganda, Benin, Cape Verde, Ghana and Ivory Coast. 23

HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Cost allocation methodologies LRIC allocation methodology prevails in the region (no data were available for Central Africa). East Africa knows the highest rate of use for LRIC. The relatively high use of FDC in Southern Africa, compared with the other Sub-Regions, may attributable to the historical use of top-down models initially based on FDC methodology. 24

HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Size of the relevant increment The use of LRIC accounting methodology implies the definition of the relevant increment. NRAs should opt to, among others, the following approaches: Marginal corresponding to an increase in costs following the introduction of a small unit of the service; Service increment corresponding to an increase in total costs following the introduction of the service; Average increment corresponding to an increase in costs following the introduction of a group of services. Out of the 3 NRAs opting for a service increment, one of them opted to a pure LRIC approach. The EC recommends a pure LRIC approach (this approach is implemented in Kenya)

25 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Cost base What arises from this survey is that the best practice consisting in using CCA as a cost base standard is used by the majority of the NRAs having addressed the issue. Best practice cost base Current Cost Accounting As stated by the EC in its recommendation* on CCA: In a competitive environment, operators would compete on the basis of current costs and

would not be compensated for costs which have been incurred through inefficiencies. Historic cost figures therefore need to be adjusted into current cost figures to reflect the costs of an efficient operator employing modern technology. * Commission recommendation of 7.5.2009 on the Regulatory Treatment of Fixed and Mobile Termination Rates in the EU 26 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Depreciation methods Straight line method is used by over half of the NRAs In principle, economic depreciation is the most appropriate depreciation method as it incorporates an appropriate allowance for the cost of capital.

Best practice depreciation method Tilted annuity Tilted annuity depreciation tilts the annuity depreciation calculation charge by adding a factor to take into account the average annual change of assets price. This method is implemented in, among others, Nigeria, France, Italy and Romania. 27 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Allowed rate of return The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) methodology is a widely accepted method for calculating the allowed rate of return. WACC is calculated by applying cost of debt and cost of equity respectively on the proportion of debt and equity in the capital employed.

All NRAs having addressed the allowed rate of return issue use WACC methodology. When using WACC, the cost of equity, which is affected by risk, need to be estimated as, contrary to cost of debt, it is not known or easily derived. To this end Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is usually used. All NRAs except one use CAPM. Some operators expressed concerned on the appropriate value retained by the NRAs. 28 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Scope and issues of regulatory auditing The scope of regulatory audit as indicated by almost all the respondents concerned by regulatory auditing is: Reconciliation with statutory accounts

Scope of costs and costs allocated, Cost valuation and allocation Cost capitalization, assets valuation and amortization Transfer charges The international best practice consists in conducting a regulatory audit regarding at least, the whole items as indicated above. 3 NRAs out of the 9 having addressed this issue reported that regulatory auditing in place in their respective countries (Mozambique, Uganda and Cape Verde) covers all these items. 29 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Operators obligations When regulatory auditing is implemented, in most cases, operators have to respond in a predefined timeframe and give access to all internal supporting data For all 12 countries where regulatory auditing is in place

The obligation for operators to respond in a predefined timeframe to any question is implemented in 8 countries The obligation for operators to give access to all internal supporting data is implemented in 10 countries 30 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Regulatory auditing process 90% of the respondents do regulatory auditing on a regular basis. In 10% of the cases, regulatory auditing is exclusively done on demand either during tariff approval process or cost modelling exercises. In most cases, regulatory auditing is

conducted by an independent auditor commissioned by the NRA. 31 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Costing tools 32 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Bottom up models 53% use a bottom up model, either as the

only costing tool or in conjunction with a Top-Down model. West Africa, with 83% of the countries using bottom up, has the highest level of use. In most cases, the cost model built by the NRA is not publicly available 33 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Data collection strategy The model development relies essentially on operators data following a specific request or a consultation procedure. This means that the implementation of a cost model requires a significant workload for data collection both from operators side and NRAs side. For all 16 countries where responses where obtained

14 countries use a specific request The best practice consisting in using regulatory cost accounting data, as a reference of costs to calibrate the model is in use in Uganda. 34 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Strategy for Bottom up models implementation Almost all respondents commissioned consultants to develop a bespoke model. In West Africa, some NRAs opted to the evolution of an existing model or using a model off the shelf (WBG) Regarding the burden associated with cost model implementation, consultant fees, based on a sample of 6 countries, ranged

from around 100k USD up to 1mil USD, corresponding to an average of 500k USD. 35 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Modelled operator and time horizon The definition of the efficient operator and time horizon to be considered in the model are key steps when building up a Bottom-up model. For all 15 countries where responses where obtained More than half of NRAs having addressed this issue model a hypothetical operator either alone or in combination with an existing operator. 6 countries use an existing operator. Regarding the time horizon a minimum of 5 years is commonly used by the NRAs. The most common is 10 years. When using LRIC allocation methodology, as this is the case for almost all

NRAs having addressed this issue, the methodology entails that the time horizon has to be sufficiently long for fixed cost to become variable. 36 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Level of demand and market share The level of demand the modelled operators shall satisfy and its market share are sensitive assumptions for the model. For all 15 countries where responses where obtained 6 countries use current level of demand. 4 countries use both current and expected demand. In the context of Sub-Sahara African countries, which are mainly still in a growing phase, it is more appropriate to estimate the future level of demand. Regarding market share, the best practice, recommended by the European Commission, is to set a market share for the modelled operator of at least 20%

which is considered at the minimum efficient scale. This is the case for all NRAs having provided the value of the retained market share. Benin, Ghana, Kenya, Uganda, Botswana. 37 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Key cost drivers Key cost drivers to consider when building the model are another key step in a bottom-up approach. A cost driver can be defined as "the factor or event that causes a cost to be incurred". For all 14 countries where responses where obtained The majority of countries uses coverage as a key cost driver, alone or in combination with other factors. It is most appropriate not to consider coverage as a key cost driver. Indeed, coverage can be described as an access type service whereby mobile

subscribers purchase the ability to access the operators network at any point of the operators coverage. Such an approach is also recommended by the European Commission and should be used as a best practice. 38 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Network configuration When adopting a bottom up approach based on efficiency considerations, assumptions regarding optimal network configuration are structuring. For all 12 countries where responses where obtained The majority of NRAs having adopted a bottom up approach model coverage on the basis of existing mobile networks configuration either by using the average of existing networks or the current coverage of largest network. Derived from efficiency consideration, the coverage to be modelled shall be the

minimal one to address the demand as done by one NRA among the NRAs having addressed this issue. With the use of existing network coverage, inefficient costs are likely to be taken into account. Regarding topology, all NRAs having adopted a FL-LRIC, except one, use the topology of the existing MNOs (i.e. scorched node methodology). 39 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Operating expenses modelling OPEX modelling is another sensitive item when adopting a FL-LRIC based bottom up approach. NRAs in the region (all 15 NRAs having addressed this issue) and beyond usually model OPEX as a mark up on network assets. The mark-up depends on assets type for the majority of the NRAs having addressed this question ,

The majority of NRAs adopting a FL-LRIC based bottom up approach use MNOs data to derive OPEX (9 out of 14 NRAs). The remainder 5, three use benchmark data and two of them a combination of benchmark and operators data 40 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Top down models implementation The level of use of a Top-Down approach is of 25% for the whole region At the Sub-Region level, Southern Africa knows the highest level of use and Central Africa has the lowest For a large proportion of countries that addressed the issue of model transparency,

the top-down model is not publicly available In consistency with international best practices, cost models, associated assumptions and their underlying rationale as well as the methodology used to build up the model should be publicly available. 41 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Data collection strategy Based on NRAs feedback on the data collection strategy for top down models one conclusion is that cost accounting routines in the region are not enough implemented to represent a cost reference for building up a top-down model. For all 9 countries where responses where obtained 4 NRAs make use of a specific request to obtain data.

3 NRAs use cost accounting data alone or in combination with a specific request. The best practice consisting in basing top-down model on cost accounting data is in place in 3 countries, namely South Africa, Zimbabwe and Benin. 42 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Benchmark The level of benchmarking tool implementation is of 38% for the whole region. Southern Africa knows the highest level of implementation with 60% of them using benchmark as a tool for MTR regulation. The level of implementation is the lowest in East Africa.

72% of the NRAs having addressed the issue of benchmark implementation use benchmark as a complementary tool to another costing tool. 43 HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 3: Overview of regulatory accounting and cost modelling in Sub-Sahara Africa Benchmark rules When using benchmark the main implementation rules are the following: The choice of the set of countries/MNOs used in the benchmark; The corrections made for country or MNO differences; The rules used to set the final price. Regarding the set of countries, the scope of countries considered varies across the region from 1 country to 38 countries, but slightly less than half of the NRAs (6

out of 13) uses 15 or more countries in the benchmark exercise Three respondents retained their respective regional economical organisation, namely SADC and ECOWAS/UEAMO as a starting point for the benchmark. 44

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Accessible Design: Infrastructure to Courses

    Accessible Design: Infrastructure to Courses

    Unwebbing Web Accessibility in Higher Ed: It's More than Just Web Pages. ... Should be accessible out the box and self disclosure is needed for academic accommodations. ... Institute procedures for addressing accessibility as a requirement within the procurement process.
  • Friendly CryptoJam: A Mechanism for Securing Physical-Layer Attributes

    Friendly CryptoJam: A Mechanism for Securing Physical-Layer Attributes

    CROSS-CORRELATION ATTACK [one of our contributions]: Semi-static fields are detectedeven after the addition of an independent jamming signal. With Block cyphering, MAC header cannot be encrypted in a network sinceMAC address cannot be used for pulling up the right decryption...
  • Grammar Notes and Mini-Lessons

    Grammar Notes and Mini-Lessons

    Grammar Notes and Mini-Lessons. Warm-up. Complete Exercise A, #1-5 on page 264. ... In ninth grade, we read the story The Most Dangerous Game out of our anthology, Glencoe Literature: The Reader's Choice. ... which he flew from New York...
  • Buddhism: The Goals - HigherRMPS

    Buddhism: The Goals - HigherRMPS

    Therevada. Scriptures called Tipitaka (3 Baskets) Vinaya - book of discipline for monks containing 227 rules. Teachings of the Buddha - Dhammapada. Jakata Tales. Goal of monks to become an Arhat. One who has passed beyond the craving which binds...
  • Basic research skills

    Basic research skills

    Note-taking can also help you begin to formulate how to express or include information from the resource in your own writing. This research diary could be easily adapted and used for books and websites as well - any resource you...
  • KDD-07 Invited Innovation Talk August 12, 2007 Usama

    KDD-07 Invited Innovation Talk August 12, 2007 Usama

    Examples of tasks addressed by Data Mining Predictive Modeling (classification, regression) Segmentation (Data Clustering ) Affinity (Summarization) relations between fields, associations, visualization Beyond Data Analysis Scaling analysis to large databases How to deal with data without having to move it...
  • Best viewed with the sound on and volume

    Best viewed with the sound on and volume

    Best viewed with the sound on… and volume set to 50% Left-click to advance. Right-click for options. To advance more quickly, click at any time.
  • Delayed ILC Roadmap

    Delayed ILC Roadmap

    Project X Overview Dave McGinnis November 1, 2007 8 GeV Extraction from the Recycler Project X Overview - McGinnis * 8 GeV Resonant Extraction from the Recycler Project X Overview - McGinnis * 8 GeV Resonant Extraction from the Recycler...