Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 3 Child Language and Disorders continued Plan Specific language impairment Phonological development Phonological disorders SLI - Definition A developmental language disorder characterized by Gleason (2001, p. 504) as involving delayed or
deviant language development in a child who exhibits no cognitive, neurological or social impairment. Children with SLI show impaired language development from birth (with problems which may either disappear during childhood or persist into adulthood) but are normal in other aspects of their physical, mental and social development (Radford 2006). Specific language impairment It is estimated that 1 3% of preschool children have SLI Studies suggest that these children do not catch up with their same age peers and are
at risk for reading problems and educational failure Features of SLI From Bishop, 2007 Possible accounts Impairment in language processing vs. impairment in processing? Impairment in the language mechanism vs. impairment in language processing aptitude? Competence or performance?
Procedural Deficit Hypothesis (PDH) Ullman, M.T. & Pierpont, E.I. 2005. Specific Language Impairment is not Specific to Language: The Procedural Deficit Hypothesis. Cortex 41, 399-433. "SLI can be largely explained by the abnormal development of brain structures that constitute the procedural memory system. Procedural memory: mental grammar, syntax, some morphology Declarative memory: mental lexicon, vocabulary, idioms, irregular past-tense forms Procedural memory Declarative vs procedural memory
Procedural: Learning new and controlling established motor and cognitive skills, habits, and other procedures E.g. typing, riding a bike, skilled game playing Aspects of rule-learning Learning and performing skills involving sequences Includes system involved in learning, representation, and use of procedural memory Brain structures involved in procedural memory a network of interconnected structures rooted in
frontal/basal-ganglia circuits, subserves the learning and execution of motor and cognitive skills. recent evidence implicates that this system is important for specific aspects of grammar a significant proportion of individuals with SLI suffer from abnormalities of this brain network, leading to impairments of the linguistic and non-linguistic functions that depend on it grammatical and lexical retrieval deficits are strongly linked to dysfunctions of the basal ganglia (BG), and of the frontal cortex, esp. Brocas area Auditory (temporal processing) deficit hypothesis
Merzenich, M. Jenkins, W., Johnston, P., S., Schreiner, C., Miller, S. L. & Tallal, P., (1996) Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training, Science, v. 271, p. 77-81. (=Fast ForWord) Task: discriminate between speech stimuli -six syllable contrasts ([ba] versus [da], [da] versus [ta],  versus [ae], [dab] versus [daeb], [sa] ] versus [ae], [dab] versus [daeb], [sa] versus [sta] and [sa] versus [sha]). Findings: LI group made most errors discriminating syllables which were differentiated by consonants and fewest errors on those differentiated by vowels.
The LI group was significantly poorer than the normal in discriminating all syllables that incorporated brief temporal cues followed rapidly in succession by other acoustic cues. They also were impaired in discriminating [sa] versus [sha]. They were unimpaired discriminating stimuli differentiated by vowels. Perceptual Deficit Model Leonard, L. B.1989. Language learnability and specific language impairment in children. Applied Psycholinguistics 10: 179-202 Following the sonority scale (Srlkirk 1984), Leonard proposes that SLI is an Auditory Perceptual Deficit: Vowels and diphthongs are easier to perceive than consonants (and consonants are particularly difficult to perceive when occurring in
clusters of two or more successive consonants) Stressed vowels are easier to perceive than unstressed vowels, long vowels and diphthongs are easier than short vowels, and full vowels are easier than reduced vowels Percentage correct probes and spontaneous speech (Rice & Wexler 1995) -ed probe -ed spontaneous -s probe -s spontaneous BE probe BE spontaneous DO probe
91 89 95 96 90 97 98 Feature Deficit Model Gopnik, M. 1990. Feature blindness: A case study. Language Acquisition 1: 139-164 Due to a genetic deficit SLI children do not have grammatical (syntactic-semantic) features in their grammar.
A global deficit But might be a graded phenomenon SLI in Hebrew monolinguals Dromi et al. (1993, 1999) Predictions: With verbal morphology so central in Hebrew, a Semitic language, it was predicted that a very few inflections, if any, would pose a problem for children with SLI inflections which carry more features would be more difficult than those which carry fewer features with errors that show a simpler feature complex Method: Hebrew speaking children with SLI, ages 4-6,
using a sentence completion task and enactments Findings Sentence completion: while monolingual children with TLD scored at ceiling, children with SLI showed 80% success when one feature was involved, but hardly ever produce the target morpheme which represented two features (fem. pl.) Enactment: while monolingual children with TLD scored at ceiling, children with SLI showed 80% success when one feature was involved, but only 60% success when two features (person and gender) were involved While in English most errors are omissions, in Hebrew most errors are substitutions in which a morpheme which marks just one feature was used to replace a morpheme which marks two
features Verb inflection in Hebrew (Dromi 1999 et al) present tense agreement items 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Fem sing Masc plur SLI
TLD - MLU Fem plur Rule Deficit Model Gopnik M & Crago MB. 1991. Familial aggregation of a developmental disorder. Cognition 39: 1-50 Studying three generations of a family in London, Gopnik & Cargo concluded that they have the same syntactic abilities as MLU matched controls, but could not generate morphological rules (due to genetic failure of the dual mechanism of morphological acquisition).
Bishop (1994) - A study of 12 SLI children ranging in age from 8;2 to 12;11 Took it off (in reply to What did they do with the top part of the pram?) It take me a long time (in reply to Did it take you a
long time to get better?) And then Mummy taked to the garage to xxx He falled in (in reply to What did Andrew do when the ice gave way?) He sawed mine brother (in reply to Has the doctor ever been to see you?) The car has broked down So is it just rules? Agreement Deficit Model Clahsen H, Bartke S and Gllner S. 1997. Formal features in impaired grammars: a comparison of English and German SLI children. Journal of Neurolinguistics 10: 151-171
Findings: Past tense - 76% of main verbs and 89% of auxiliaries 3Sg present tense - 49% of main verbs and 35% of auxiliaries SLI children have problems with acquiring uninterpretable features, which make no contribution to the meaning of the sentence (semantically redundant), e.g., agreement features Contexts for 3rd person auxiliaries in the corpus of Clahsen, Bartke and Gllner (from Radford 2006) - how do these examples support their claim?
Contexts where adults would use a third person singular present form of the progressive auxiliary be 22. And boy picking em up (JW 11;03) 23. He jumping over a gate (WL 11;05). 24. Apples fallen out on the boy who pinching them (JW 11;03) 25. The man taking the cat down on the ground (AZ11 12;03) 26. The dog taking slipper off him (AZ11 12;03) 27. Her hugging it (CT 13;11) Contexts where adults would use a third person singular present form of the perfect auxiliary have 35. She sometimes buy stuff and then paint it what havent got coat of paint on it (RJ 11;11)
36. He been tied on (AZ12 13;0) Contexts where adults would use a third person singular present form of the tense auxiliary do 37. He dont know (JW 10;3) 38. He dont get hungry (JW 10;03) 39. What, when he dont go to work? (JW 10;03) 40. And the bus dont take no notice (AZ11 10;3) 41. And he dont know how to (RJ 10;11) 42. He dont know how to put his brakes on (AZ12 11;0) Mabel L. Rice, Kenneth Wexler, & Jennifer Francois (2001)
Age Matched At 5 years of age, children in the SLI group were below age peers in their comprehension of reversible full verbal passives, and similar to their younger lexically-equivalent peers Van der Lely HKJ and Battell J (2003) (a) Who Miss Scarlett saw somebody? (Response to Miss Scarlet saw someone in the lounge. Ask me who the target response being Who did Miss Scarlet see in the lounge?) (b) Which Reverend Green open a door? (Response to Reverend Green opened a door. Ask me which one the target response being Which door did Rev. Green open?).
(c) What did Colonel Mustard had something in his pocket? (Response to Something was in Colonel Mustards pocket. Ask me what the target response being What was in Colonel Mustards pocket?). Representational Deficit For Dependent Relations (RDDR) Van der Lely, H.K.J. & Battell, J. (2003). Wh-movement in children with grammatical SLI: A test of the RDDR hypothesis, Language, 79, 153-18.1 "SLI children have problems in handling non-local dependencies (between pairs of constituents which are not immediately adjacent) such as those involved in tense marking (which involves a T-V dependency both in the
agreement-based analysis of Adger 2003 and in the Affix Hopping analysis of Radford 2004), agreement (which involves a subject-verb dependency), determining pronominal reference (which involves a pronoun-antecedent dependency), and movement (which involves a dependency between two constituents, one of which attracts the other)." Deficit in Computational Grammatical Complexity (CGC) Marinis, T. & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2007). On-line processing of wh-questions in children with G-SLI and typically developing children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 42(5), 557-582. The CGC Hypothesis claims that the core deficit in some but not
all forms of SLI is in the representation and/or mechanisms underlying the construction of hierarchical grammatical structures. For G-SLI children their grammar is characterized by Grammatical Structural Economy in syntax, morphology and for most phonology too. Thus, the least complex structure will surface. Within the syntactic component, the core deficit is in computing syntactic dependencies between constituents Further, complexity is defined as the number of movement operations, thus subject questions are predicted to be less problematic than object questions because the former has one less movement operation Domain general, or domain specific? Deficits were also found for:
Lexical access NWR Narratives Executive functions But pragmatics: In children with SLI (14 Subjects: 3;11-4;10), pragmatic principles develop normally as a function of age, rather than as a function of grammar developmental stage (Scheaffer et al, 2003)
Phonological development and disorders Phonological development How children establish the sound sequences of their language Mental representations Related to (but distinct from) phonetic representations Effects that sounds have on one another in context Structural system
Hierarchical view of language structures features phonemes morphemes words phrases discourse In principle, things can go wrong at any level In practice, its hard to tell where a particular deficit might be functionally located e.g. an articulation deficit might result from a problem at the phonetic level, or at the phonological level or it might just be an articulation problem Assessment is supposed to help us decide which level (if any one) is primarily affected Treatment can be directed at any of these levels Phonological development
Normal processes applied to speech sounds To some extent, these reflect the limitations of the phonetic inventory at different developmental stages In normal phonological development, phonological processes are gradually eliminated as the childs phonological system assimilates to the adults Phonological processes in normal development See handout Phonological theories
Evaluating theories: levels of adequacy (Chomsky (1965) Observational adequacy Descriptive adequacy Explanatory adequacy Theories of language: universality, restrictiveness, learnability A note about learnability Children have to acquire both knowledge about motor aspects of speech production, and knowledge about linguistic aspects of speech production If these are distinct systems, then their development is
essentially independent This means that one child could be having problems with the motor aspects of one sound AND the language aspects of another sound at the same time Therapy cannot be an all or nothing approach we have to bear in mind that the systems underpinning speech and phonology are inextricably linked and interdependent in ways we dont really understand Distinctive feature theory Chomsky & Halles system classifies sounds according to five sets of features: - major classes: sonorant, syllabic, consonantal
- manner: continuant, lateral, nasal - cavity: anterior, coronal, high, low, back, round - tongue root: tense/lax - laryngeal: voiced/voiceless Distinctive feature theory Attempt to delineate the properties of sounds used contrastively in a particular language Features are atomic and binary Looking at similarities and differences between sounds E.g. /k/ consonantal
+ + Distinctive feature theory: clinical implications When sound substitutions are compared to target sounds features, similarities and differences can be identified Phonological processes can be noted to capture the differences between target and surface realization Sound substitutions can be broken down and analyzed Can see whether targets and surface realizations share any features
Can see whether specific error patterns exist Distinctive feature theories: clinical implications Shift in focus from form to function children acquire features, rather than sounds (Jakobson 1942) therapy can facilitate this process, and a certain amount of generalization should occur Phonological notation
AB / - context #__ __# V__V C__C __ [+stop]
Analyzing data using DFT Dataset: Peter aged 4;2
pen b] versus [ae], [dab] versus [daeb], [sa] n pet p] versus [ae], [dab] versus [daeb], [sa] t Ben b] versus [ae], [dab] versus [daeb], [sa] n face peIt fat pt bus bt dash dt fuzz bd cat kt bed b] versus [ae], [dab] versus [daeb], [sa] d
shed d] versus [ae], [dab] versus [daeb], [sa] d sad dd park pa:k bark ba:k peas bi:d boat but
kiss kIt chip tIp coat kut comb gum Peters rules [-voice] [+voice] / ___ [+voice] [-stop] [+stop] Treatment approaches Articulation therapy e.g. oral-motor modeling and drilling Phonemic approaches e.g. minimal pairs, in
perception and production Phonological therapy e.g. producing more target sound sequences in more complex linguistic units Aim: generalization of skills: (a) to other levels of representation (e.g. phonological awareness influencing articulations) (b) to other environments and contexts spontaneous use of appropriate speech sounds and patterns Phonological Processes Hodson 1989: focus on teaching appropriate patterns (not eliminating inappropriate ones) Within the target processes, select sounds for which the child is stimulable
A possible preferred order for tackling error processes: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. WI single consonants WF single consonants in CVC Syllable deletions in 2 and 3 syllable words Errors relating to velar and alveolar sounds S clusters Liquids
This hierarchy takes into account developmental factors, as well as intelligibility issues Refer back to nonlinear approaches too: want to impact the whole hierarchy, so target sound errors / classes near the top of the tree Nonlinear hierarchy Root sonorant consonantal laryngeal voice
Presentation of Knowledge and Ideas: Present information, findings, and supporting evidence such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning and the organization, development, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
are among the most widely read of his poems, some of the best known in Romantic poetry, and have been compared to the poetry of Shakespeare. His prediction was right: as he was dying of tuberculosis, his reviews did indeed...
Plumbing Fixtures and Appliances (Plumbing Code Modification, Local Ordinance, etc.) $2 million in 2016 and $1.5 million in 2017. Evaluate recovery options for 3 waterbodies. Options include . Conservation. Recharge. ... Reclaimed Water Projects
Fiscal Year 2014 Marianjoy Online Nursing Journal Club Overall Participation. The Marianjoy Online Nursing Journal Club is a joint effort between the Nursing Department, the Medical Library, and the Research Department
The Civil War (1861-1865) Through Maps, Charts, Graphs & Pictures Susan M. Pojer Horace Greeley HS Chappaqua, NY Black Troops Freeing Slaves Extensive Legislation Passed Without the South in Congress 1861 - Morrill Tariff Act 1862 - Homestead Act 1862...
An Engineering Design Process Prototype and Test. You may need to incrementally test features of your design as you build. Develop testing procedures and a data collection plan. Qualitative - Does our design solve the problem?
EES systems are often expressed by rated power in megawatts (MW) and energy storage capacity in megawatt-hours (MWh).*. As of April 2017, the . U.S. had over 24.2 GW. of rated power in energy storage. 2.5%. of delivered electric power...
Ready to download the document? Go ahead and hit continue!