The Consolation of Philosophy AP English IV Journal Warm-up What is happiness? In what specific ways do human beings misconceive, and therefore miss happiness? Answer in paragraph form and be prepared to share your response. What is Philosophy? Philosophy is quite simply mans search for meaning, the search for truth.
If youre not confused, youre either a god or an animal, but youre not a philosopher. The Context Written while Boethius was exiled and in prison, it became one of the most influential books ever written in Latin. The book takes the form of a dialogue between Boethius and Philosophy, personified as a woman. Boethius, once a high ranking official of state, has been wrongly accused, exiled, and tortured daily while he awaits his execution date. He is accused of being a traitor. Both its imagery and its arguments became part of the common stock of medieval ideas.
The Issues Poses a problem as the text does not seem explicitly Christian. Why would a Christian author turn to philosophy, not to faith, in the greatest crisis of his life? Some interpretations suggest Boethius was never more than superficially Christian, that his real loyalty was to pagan philosophy. Others emphasize the Christian imagery and language of the text Another perspective suggests Boethius set out to write a philosophical rather than a theological work in order to emphasize what Christians had in common with the best pagan thought, as representatives of civilization against the barbarians who had falsely accused and imprisoned him.
The Complaint The prisoners main complaint is that divine providence leaves human affairs ungoverned; the wicked have power and the good suffer at their hands. The Consolation, therefore, examines the nature of providence, its relation to human affairs, and the nature of good and evil, moving outward from mans feelings about a specific historical situation to a timeless, global, Gods eye view of the whole sweep of the universe. The Argument
Boethius first complains about the loss of good fortune (Book I). Philosophy replies that it is the nature of fortune to be fickle. Moreover, the goods of fortune are not true goods. What then are goods? Philosophy begins to answer this question by examining five false goods. Everyone seeks happiness: a good so complete it leaves nothing more to be desired. Misguided people seek to attain happiness through wealth, public office, kingship, celebrity, and pleasure. Yet, these false goods do not even provide the partial happiness for the sake of which people pursue them.
The Resolution Philosophy goes on to argue that people seek these goods as if they are separate, when in fact they are one. True happiness is an all encompassing good. Such happiness cannot be found in transient things. Ultimately, God is the perfect good and source of happiness. There has to be a perfect good that is the source of all good. That good has to be in God because we already believe that nothing better than God can be imagined. God is the source of his own goodness and is, indeed, identical with that goodness. Given that divinity and happiness are the same thing, it follows that human beings become happy by attaining divinity. Remember.
All imperfect goods can be recognized as imperfect because they are partial; the perfect good must be a unity. Thus, the one and the good (or unity and goodness) are the same. We can see this by looking at the natural tendency of things to maintain their unity and integrity and noting that when a thing loses its unity altogether, it ceases to exist. Thus, all things desire or aim at unity, which means that all things desire or aim at the good. The work is best known for. . .
Its influential discussion of the problem of divine foreknowledge and human freedom Boethius worries that if Gods foreknowledge is both comprehensive and infallible, our actions are unnecessary. We cannot do anything other than what we, in fact, do because we cannot behave in a way that God turns out to be mistaken. Still, it is hard to see how we could ever deserve blame or punishment for doing wrong, or praise or reward for doing right, when we never have the power to do anything other than what we do. Philosophy works to.
Show how human freedom and moral responsibility are possible within Gods providential governance of the universe. She explains that God is eternalthat is, outside time altogetherso that he does not foreknow our actions; he simply knows them, timelessly. She then uses the doctrine of divine eternity to show how our actions are not necessary in any sense that threatens freedom or moral responsibility. If God is really as powerful and good as Philosophy claims, why are there evils?
She plans to argue that the powerful men are in fact always the good, while the wicked are always the abject or weak; that vices never go unpunished, nor virtues unrewarded; that the good always achieve success, and the wicked suffer misfortune. Success in human action depends on two things: will and power
Everyone, whether virtuous or wicked, wants to attain happiness, but the wicked dont attain it. Therefore we must conclude that they lack the power to attain it. Boethius objectsDont evil men have power, given that they are able to do evil? Philosophy replies: No, because evil is nothing, the power to do evil isnt really power at all.
Boethius accepts these arguments, but still wishes that the evil were not allowed to ravage the good. Philosophy replies they are not allowed to do so. Their schemes often come to bad ends, and death soon overtakes them. She also notes the wicked are worse off when their schemes are successful: its bad to desire evil, even worse to achieve it. Book Vs Problem/Solution The problem of foreknowledge and
freedom is an argument designed to suggest the incompatibility of divine foreknowledge and human free choice. What God knows must be the case. What must be the case is not subject to human free choice God foreknows all our actions
Therefore, our future actions are not subject to human choice Philosophy says the solution depends on. Understanding the nature of Gods foreknowledge and the nature of necessity. Gods knowledge of the future is not properly called foreknowledge, since Gods understanding and knowledge is eternal Eternity is the complete and perfect possession
of illimitable life all at once. Gods life is not successive as ours. He has no past, present, or future. His foreknowledge is analogous to our own vision of something present, such as a chariot race. Gods foreknowledge is not incompatible with free choice. Its true that if we see the charioteer doing something, he must be doing it, yet we do not suppose that this must in any way interfere with his free choice. This is the same kind of necessityBoethius calls it conditional necessitythat attaches to what God foreknows. Thus, what God knows is conditionally unnecessary.
But something that is conditionally necessary can still be the subject of free choice. Therefore, the original argument for the incompatibility of foreknowledge and freedom fails. And this is where the work ends. Metaphors of the Text The Wheel of Fortune The mutability of life is depicted as its main attribute Change is the nature of fortune/Life is a roulette wheel Concentric circles of the Divine The wheel of fortune is a circle out of control, but divine nature uses the circle as a symbol of order
God is at the center of the universe, a force of goodness and order; as distance increases, so does unhappiness. Philosophy as medicine/Evil as sickness Lady Philosophy uses logic and stories to enable Boethius to once again understand his nature and the nature of the divine. He has forgotten his true nature. He has forgotten the source of Supreme good and, therefore, his happiness. Whatever it is. True happiness leaves nothing else to be desired. We are motivated by our very natures to pursue happiness..everything action/choice is aiming at happiness. Philosophy lists the false goods of wealth, kingship, public office, celebrity, and pleasure. People seek these goods as
though they were separate thingsand they can only be obtained in one encompassing good. (Book III, 9, p. 64) True and perfect happiness is something that makes a person powerful, and venerable, and joyful, and self-sufficient, and renownedall in one. This is a very Platonian argumentonly an eternal and permanent good can offer real and true happiness. (Book III, 10, p. 68)
Référence et contre référence Un système de référence et de contre-référence Différentes structures qui offrent des prestations de prévention et de prise en charge qui vont orienter ou référer les personnes L'orientation est réalisée en fonction des compétences et des...
Gavin Scott Analysis Manager Neil Potts Performance Co-ordinator Julie Gates Admin Assistant National Coach Vacant David Romprey Kit Manager Alan Tait Backs Coach Ritchie Dixon Director of Rugby Interim Iain Paxton John Jeffreu Under 21 Pete Gallacher Pete Wright Under...
MATP Time Study and Direct Admin Cost. 9/21/2016. Frontline staff that interacts directly with MATP recipients and trips. Activities of frontline staff would include services such as: Application processing and assistance. Case management. Intake.
ESIP Federation Summer 2009 Meeting Spatial Decision Support (SDS) Knowledge Portal Systematic representation of body of knowledge of SDS Promotes semantic clarity of concepts commonly used in spatial decision support Organizes and facilitates access to commonly used resources that aid...
TMT: the next generation of segmented mirror telescopes Jerry Nelson, UCSC GTC Inauguration Seminar 2009 July 25 Outline Project Introduction Telescope overview TMT key features Major science goals Science Instruments TMT Mauna Kea Best high-altitude seeing 4200 m Mauna Kea...
ACT and the College Board periodically produce ACT/SAT concordance tables to show how scores on each test compare. With the redesign of the SAT in 2016, researchers from the College Board and ACT conducted a new concordance study to produce...
Under most circumstances, behaviorism is an excellent approach for assessing a learners knowledge and comprehension of a particular subject. Cognitive Levels. In 1956, Benjamin Bloom headed a group of educational psychologists who developed a classification of levels of intellectual behavior...
Ready to download the document? Go ahead and hit continue!